ReconBridge — CRM↔ERP Reconciliation Agents

They move the data; we check the work. An iPaaS fires when a record changes and reports whether its own job succeeded — it has no opinion about whether your CRM and your ERP currently agree. ReconBridge sits beside whatever you already use, reads both systems, and continuously answers that question at the record and field level. Most customers would keep their existing integrations and add this on top; if a sync is silently dropping 3% of orders, we're the thing that tells you.

Only when you let it, field by field, and only after a human approves that specific exception. It ships read-only. Autonomous writeback is the failure mode that gets these projects cancelled, so it isn't the default and it never applies to a field you haven't explicitly opened.

A founding-pilot engagement, not a self-serve login. The software is built and running: five agents, the exception queue, the evidence log, the whole dashboard. What we do together in week one is wire it to your actual systems — that is a working session with us, not a signup form. You tell us your CRM/ERP pair when you check out and we come to that session having read your schema. If we can't make your pair work, we cancel you and refund the month; the plans are month-to-month with no minimum for exactly that reason.

Salesforce and HubSpot on the CRM side, NetSuite on the ERP side, plus a CSV path that works with anything. Straight answer on maturity: the CSV path is the one we've run end to end, and the Salesforce and NetSuite connectors are written to their documented APIs but have not yet run against a live tenant — the founding pilots are where that happens, with us doing the work. That is the honest reason these are priced as pilots and not as a finished product, and it's why we're taking a small number of them.

Two ways, and one caveat. Deterministic identity keys resolve the overwhelming majority of records before anything fuzzy runs, and only genuinely ambiguous pairs get escalated — below a confidence threshold nothing is linked at all, it goes to a human with the near-miss attached. The caveat: your two systems almost certainly use different vocabularies for the same thing, and "Closed Won" versus "Billed" would otherwise flag every order you have. Mapping those is part of onboarding, and it is the first thing we do.

Yes, and here's exactly how, because it matters. Six research agents worked one domain each against a strict evidence rule: every demand claim had to come from an analyst report, a vendor's own pricing page, a dated funding round, public earnings, a named survey or a regulatory text — no forum posts, no vibes. That produced 41 candidates scored on demand evidence, contract value, how verifiable the gap was, buildability and defensibility; this one ranked first, and it's the first of the ten we actually built. What that does NOT mean: that anyone has paid for it yet, or that we've run it against your stack. The research says the problem is real and expensive. Only a pilot says the product works.